We’ve been lucky enough to drink a fair bit of Fyne Ales Jarl and Oakham Citra lately, though not yet side by side in the same pub, and they’re both fantastic beers.
If we could easily, reliably get one or the other near where we live, we’d probably not drink much else, at least for a few months.
But Al from Fuggled asked the following question…
Is there a finer Citra hopped beer than @FyneAles Jarl??
— Alistair Reece (@Fuggled) July 26, 2019
…it got us thinking.
We concluded, quite quickly, based on gut feeling, that Jarl is a better beer. (Or more to our taste, anyway.)
Twitter agreed with us, too:
https://twitter.com/BoakandBailey/status/1154854540946096128
Again, to reiterate, we love Oakham Citra, as do many people who told us they preferred Jarl.
For us, it’s perhaps still a top ten beer.
But what gives Jarl that slight edge?
It’s maybe that Citra, when we really think about it, has a sharp, insistent, almost clanging note that the more subtle Scottish ale avoids. It can get a bit tiring, even, four pints into a session.
We often find ourselves thinking about beer in terms of sound and in this case, you might say Citra is clipping in the treble, just a touch.
There’s another possible factor, of course: we think most of the Jarl we’ve drunk has come sparkled, while the Citra is usually presented as nature intended.
2 replies on “Jarl vs. Citra – clipping in the treble?”
Of the various iterations on my homebrew best bitter recipe (4.2% abv, 42 IBU) the one using Citra has been my favourite so far, so maybe Citra just works perfectly with well balanced, moreish, British style ordinary and best bitters?
We don’t get either Jarl or Oakham Citra reliably over here so a side by side for me will have to wait until some future trip to Blighty.
I’m with ‘smart arse reply’.