In 1960, a mysterious man slid into pubs in and around Oldham and secretly tested the strength of the beer. What he found was criminal.
We first came across a version of this story back in 2016 when we filleted a 1969 book called How To Run a Pub by Tony White.
His version goes like this:
In 1965, fourteen Manchester licensees, all in roughly the same area of the town, were fined a total of £557 (the highest fine £37) for this very offence. It is interesting to note that these prosecutions were successfully brought as the result of a tip-off from a mystery man, whose identity has never been revealed and who never explained how he came to his conclusions, though the accuracy of his findings suggests that he had some special knowledge or know-how (some say he was an employee of a rival brewery).
This Mr X seems to have gone round his locals, sampled their beer and sent in a report on twelve of them to the police. The Customs and Excise boys immediately went into action and swooped down on about twenty pubs in the area including those mentioned by their anonymous informant. To their astonishment, they discovered that in ten cases out of twelve Mr X was proved right, though in only one case did the landlord actually admit to watering his beer.
Having done our usual checks in the archive, we can’t find any reference to such an event in 1965.
That doesn’t mean it didn’t happen, or that his dates are wrong – only that if it did, and his dates are right, then either:
- it didn’t get a write-up in the papers
- or those papers haven’t been digitised yet
What we did find, however, was a remarkably similar story, from the same part of the world, from 1960.
Here’s how it was reported in the Birmingham Daily Post for 14 April that year:
Twenty-five Oldham and district publicans appeared at Oldham yesterday as a result, it was stated, of a sampling drive carried out by officers of the Customs and Excise Department. All pleaded guilty to being in possession of beer that had been diluted with water, three admitting that they had diluted the beer. A fine of £15 plus 1 guinea costs was imposed on each summons. Mr. W. S. Hill, for the Customs and Excise, said that in 22 cases they could not prove that a deliberate fraud had been committed by the licensees.
The excuses given by publicans for why there was water in their beer are funny, a little embarrassing, but also illuminating:
Mrs. Emma Lees of the Old Post Office Public House, Manchester Road, Oldham, Clifford Pybus of the Wagon and Horses, Manchester Road, Oldham, and Donald Jinks of the Church Inn, Middleton Road, Royton, admitted having diluted the beer.
Mr. Hill said that Jinks had written stating that he had accidentally knocked over a bucket of beer, and had added some water to the beer.
We’re not sure we quite follow this one. Why was the beer was in a bucket? Possibly because it was about to be returned to the cask from… wherever it had been before that. Then he trips over it, or whatever, spills some, and tops it up? This sounds exactly like an excuse made up on the fly.
Mr. J. Lord, for Mrs. Lees, said that she had been under the impression that when beer was muddy on being pumped she was entitled to add some lemonade to it. This she had done. The lemonade cost more than the mild beer.
That she thought this was legal, or claims as much, suggests that it was a reasonably common practice, doesn’t it? We might quite like to try (unmuddy) mild with a lemonade top.
Mr. Harold Riches, for Pybul, said there had not been a deliberate attempt to defraud the customers. but Pybus had carried out injudicious piece of manipulation. He had put a quantity of bitter beer that was rather clouded into the mild beer. Other explanations were that water must have got into the beer while the pumps were being cleaned.
This practice of dumping bad bitter into mild, where it wouldn’t be noticed, has come up before. Maybe that would interfere with gravity readings.
But it does feel more likely, despite all this wriggling, that he put a bit of water into the cask to stretch it further. Especially as we know (same link as above) that this was standard practice:
It is useful to know that customers won’t notice six gallons of water in thirty gallons of ale, and “thirty bob a bucket for water is not so bad”… Grainger chose his watering hours carefully: after all, which excise officer ever worked after midday on Saturday?
If you know anything about Tony White’s 1965 Manchester Excise swoop, do let us know, especially if you have clippings or the like.
Main picture: The Cranberry, which happened to be the only 1960s Oldham pub of which we had a handy photo.
7 replies on “Watered-down beer in Oldham, 1960”
Sullying the good name of the Jinks family.
Was that the same Tony White of Tony White and Martin Green fame? (Evg Standard Guide to London pubs?)
That’s the one!
Interesting. I’ll ask around.
I think publicans not being able to water their beer might have been one of the reasons for brewers round there introducing tank beer, and maybe similarly keg beer down south.
Tank beer was far more susceptible to being watered. It was rife because tank cleaning was done by brewery staff who were encouraged to leave some water in the cleaned tanks. The tanker drivers would pump the ‘spare’ beer into another part full tank, again, with water. Everyone made something out of the deal from the club stewards, publicans to the brewery staff.
Using lemonade to clear cloudy or ‘muddy’ beer is/was an old trick. I worked behind a bar in Cambridge in the late 1970s, and it was one that the manager used if the beer didn’t drop bright within a reasonable time. A large bottle of lemonade would clear a barrel in double-quick time.